<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acxiom playing nasty in Opt Out List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2003/11/17/acxiom-playing-nasty-in-opt-out-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2003/11/17/acxiom-playing-nasty-in-opt-out-list/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical site for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a Family of Tech Shows and Content.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Q.</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2003/11/17/acxiom-playing-nasty-in-opt-out-list/comment-page-1/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Q.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/?p=1817#comment-760</guid>
		<description>Just my take on this subject, but I would assume that any reputable company representing itself as a blanket opt-out service would at least provide the requests on some type of electronic medium to the data source providers.  I wouldn&#039;t expect someone to compile the information related to the opt-outs...what is wrong with sending it via CD?  I would consider a packet containing 750+ copied pages junk mail as well....If you want to be treated as a reputable company, then you should provide the service that you are charging for...not just expect someone else to do the work for you.  Maybe it&#039;s time that the &quot;not-for-profit&quot; Private Citizen spend the money they are charging to actually provide that service?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just my take on this subject, but I would assume that any reputable company representing itself as a blanket opt-out service would at least provide the requests on some type of electronic medium to the data source providers.  I wouldn&#8217;t expect someone to compile the information related to the opt-outs&#8230;what is wrong with sending it via CD?  I would consider a packet containing 750+ copied pages junk mail as well&#8230;.If you want to be treated as a reputable company, then you should provide the service that you are charging for&#8230;not just expect someone else to do the work for you.  Maybe it&#8217;s time that the &#8220;not-for-profit&#8221; Private Citizen spend the money they are charging to actually provide that service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unSecure Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2003/11/17/acxiom-playing-nasty-in-opt-out-list/comment-page-1/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>unSecure Privacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/?p=1817#comment-761</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Acxiom&#039;s Treatment of Opt-Outs&lt;/strong&gt;

Wired magazine has an interesting article about Acxiom, a company that collects personal information for sale and distribution to marketers (telephonic and direct mail). The article relates how Acxiom allows individuals to opt-out of Acxiom&#039;s databases...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Acxiom&#8217;s Treatment of Opt-Outs</strong></p>
<p>Wired magazine has an interesting article about Acxiom, a company that collects personal information for sale and distribution to marketers (telephonic and direct mail). The article relates how Acxiom allows individuals to opt-out of Acxiom&#8217;s databases&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2003/11/17/acxiom-playing-nasty-in-opt-out-list/comment-page-1/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/?p=1817#comment-759</guid>
		<description>Read the Wired article. Based on what I read in the article, I don&#039;t know that the FTC would do much of anything on this particular issue (although JetBlue might be different).  A bit of a different take at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unsecureprivacy.com/2003/11/acxioms_treatme.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unSecure Privacy: Acxiom&#039;s Treatment of Opt-Outs&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the Wired article. Based on what I read in the article, I don&#8217;t know that the FTC would do much of anything on this particular issue (although JetBlue might be different).  A bit of a different take at: <a href="http://www.unsecureprivacy.com/2003/11/acxioms_treatme.html" rel="nofollow">unSecure Privacy: Acxiom&#8217;s Treatment of Opt-Outs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

