<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Movable Type users abandon Ship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/05/24/some-movable-type-users-abandon-ship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/05/24/some-movable-type-users-abandon-ship/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical weblog for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a twice weekly tech podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Battleangel</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/05/24/some-movable-type-users-abandon-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Battleangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 17:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/05/24/some-movable-type-users-abandon-ship/#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about Wordpress but I hardly think it can be worse than MT. From what I&#039;ve seen of the MT system it is obsolete. Not worth paying a single penny for unless they manage to make a real CMS out of v3.
I don&#039;t understand this loyalty. Well I do, but I still think it is nauseating. I agree that the conversion process will be cumbersome but what does it matter if it&#039;s worth it in the end.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
There are far better CMS solutions than MT and WP out there ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about Wordpress but I hardly think it can be worse than MT. From what I&#8217;ve seen of the MT system it is obsolete. Not worth paying a single penny for unless they manage to make a real CMS out of v3.<br />
I don&#8217;t understand this loyalty. Well I do, but I still think it is nauseating. I agree that the conversion process will be cumbersome but what does it matter if it&#8217;s worth it in the end.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
There are far better CMS solutions than MT and WP out there &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
