<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Netscape Browser Works Better With Websites Designed for Internet Explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/11/30/new-netscape-browser-works-better-with-websites-designed-for-internet-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/11/30/new-netscape-browser-works-better-with-websites-designed-for-internet-explorer/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical site for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a Family of Tech Shows and Content.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: treego14</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/11/30/new-netscape-browser-works-better-with-websites-designed-for-internet-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>treego14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/11/30/new-netscape-browser-works-better-with-websites-designed-for-internet-explorer/#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>I think Netscape allowing for IE to render websites is not that big of a deal.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
Firefox has an extension called IEView which allows a user to easily browse any website in IE when it is called for.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
Opera also has a few different ways a user can easily access IE for the currently open webpage, as well.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
So, this is being overly hyped as something novel, I believe.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Netscape allowing for IE to render websites is not that big of a deal.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
Firefox has an extension called IEView which allows a user to easily browse any website in IE when it is called for.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
Opera also has a few different ways a user can easily access IE for the currently open webpage, as well.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
So, this is being overly hyped as something novel, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pionar</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/11/30/new-netscape-browser-works-better-with-websites-designed-for-internet-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Pionar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2004/11/30/new-netscape-browser-works-better-with-websites-designed-for-internet-explorer/#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>I think you misunderstand.  The user can switch to using Microsoft&#039;s IE ActiveX control, which is the same engine used by IE, security risks and all.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
I don&#039;t think this will hurt or help Firefox or IE.  I think the people it&#039;s geared toward don&#039;t really care about what&#039;s powering their browser as long as it works.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you misunderstand.  The user can switch to using Microsoft&#8217;s IE ActiveX control, which is the same engine used by IE, security risks and all.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
I don&#8217;t think this will hurt or help Firefox or IE.  I think the people it&#8217;s geared toward don&#8217;t really care about what&#8217;s powering their browser as long as it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

