<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you willing to hand your RSS feed over to FeedBurner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2005/01/31/are-you-willing-to-hand-your-rss-feed-over-to-feedburner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2005/01/31/are-you-willing-to-hand-your-rss-feed-over-to-feedburner/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical site for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a Family of Tech Shows and Content.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Newest Industry</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2005/01/31/are-you-willing-to-hand-your-rss-feed-over-to-feedburner/comment-page-1/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>The Newest Industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2005/01/31/are-you-willing-to-hand-your-rss-feed-over-to-feedburner/#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Feedburner burning folks?&lt;/strong&gt;

Over the last few days, I have read a couple of tales of woe and misery surrounding the FeedBurner service [here and here]. I am not sure what has happened, as a lot of the blogging community does use this
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Feedburner burning folks?</strong></p>
<p>Over the last few days, I have read a couple of tales of woe and misery surrounding the FeedBurner service [here and here]. I am not sure what has happened, as a lot of the blogging community does use this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

