<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSSCACHE.com another RSS feed Hijacker!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/07/13/rsscachecom-another-rss-feed-hijacker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/07/13/rsscachecom-another-rss-feed-hijacker/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical site for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a Family of Tech Shows and Content.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/07/13/rsscachecom-another-rss-feed-hijacker/comment-page-1/#comment-2917</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/07/13/rsscachecom-another-rss-feed-hijacker/#comment-2917</guid>
		<description>I also think the other use that they claim for this is to save bandwidth for the users.  Instead of downloading the whole rss feed every time, only the deltas are sent to the client.  This could be useful for people on dialup, or using the cell phone network to download the feed.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
Personally, I don&#039;t see the difference between this and an ISP or company running a http proxy like squid.  In either case, the content will be cached, and the number of hit one the server will be less.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think the other use that they claim for this is to save bandwidth for the users.  Instead of downloading the whole rss feed every time, only the deltas are sent to the client.  This could be useful for people on dialup, or using the cell phone network to download the feed.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
Personally, I don&#8217;t see the difference between this and an ISP or company running a http proxy like squid.  In either case, the content will be cached, and the number of hit one the server will be less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Timberlake</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/07/13/rsscachecom-another-rss-feed-hijacker/comment-page-1/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Timberlake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/07/13/rsscachecom-another-rss-feed-hijacker/#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>I can understand the service they offer, for those bloggers who do not have the bandwidth for the many hits that RSS gets, but that&#039;s what FeedBurner is for.  If someone wanted their service, they would register for it.  I don&#039;t blame you for being mad, I view it just like you do, and I did the same thing just recently.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the service they offer, for those bloggers who do not have the bandwidth for the many hits that RSS gets, but that&#8217;s what FeedBurner is for.  If someone wanted their service, they would register for it.  I don&#8217;t blame you for being mad, I view it just like you do, and I did the same thing just recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

