<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Disclosure needed at Diggnation on Zune Sponsorship!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/11/20/full-disclosure-needed-at-diggnation-on-zune-sponsorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/11/20/full-disclosure-needed-at-diggnation-on-zune-sponsorship/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical site for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a Family of Tech Shows and Content.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PNMarkW2</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/11/20/full-disclosure-needed-at-diggnation-on-zune-sponsorship/comment-page-1/#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>PNMarkW2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2006/11/20/full-disclosure-needed-at-diggnation-on-zune-sponsorship/#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>You know, it&#039;s great to talk about &quot;transparency&quot; and all, but truth to tell I&#039;m more concerned about the &quot;very public disclosure&quot; of the original deal gone bad. It&#039;s been bugging me since I read about it here. I just can&#039;t think of any other way to say it, but this whole thing just seems so totally unprofessional. If bloggers and podcasters want to be taken seriously they&#039;ll need to at least act professional in their business dealings, which can at times include a little things known as confidentiality. Posting the details of a deal you don&#039;t like in public, for whatever purpose, just seems so childish, and not someone *I* would want to do business with, much less read.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
~Mark
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;s great to talk about &#8220;transparency&#8221; and all, but truth to tell I&#8217;m more concerned about the &#8220;very public disclosure&#8221; of the original deal gone bad. It&#8217;s been bugging me since I read about it here. I just can&#8217;t think of any other way to say it, but this whole thing just seems so totally unprofessional. If bloggers and podcasters want to be taken seriously they&#8217;ll need to at least act professional in their business dealings, which can at times include a little things known as confidentiality. Posting the details of a deal you don&#8217;t like in public, for whatever purpose, just seems so childish, and not someone *I* would want to do business with, much less read.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
~Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

