<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC says Net Neutraliy is not needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2007/06/27/ftc-says-net-neutraliy-is-not-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2007/06/27/ftc-says-net-neutraliy-is-not-needed/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical site for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a Family of Tech Shows and Content.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOTI</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2007/06/27/ftc-says-net-neutraliy-is-not-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-3578</link>
		<dc:creator>HOTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2007/06/27/ftc-says-net-neutraliy-is-not-needed/#comment-3578</guid>
		<description>I would say this is a logical wait and see approach, not one advocating for preemptive regulation based on speculation and hypothetical scenarios.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
I work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition on this issue and this is the logical approach we have been advocating. Consumer protection laws are in place to deal with any potential wrongdoing. Additionally, as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/06/broadband.shtm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; notes, the FTC will continue to monitor the issue closely.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;the FTC, for its part, will continue to devote substantial resources to maintaining competition and protecting consumers in the broadband area. In addition to vigorously enforcing the antitrust and consumer protection laws, the FTC will expend considerable efforts on consumer education, industry guidance, and competition advocacy in the area of broadband Internet access.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say this is a logical wait and see approach, not one advocating for preemptive regulation based on speculation and hypothetical scenarios.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
I work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition on this issue and this is the logical approach we have been advocating. Consumer protection laws are in place to deal with any potential wrongdoing. Additionally, as the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/06/broadband.shtm" rel="nofollow">report</a> notes, the FTC will continue to monitor the issue closely.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
<i>&#8220;the FTC, for its part, will continue to devote substantial resources to maintaining competition and protecting consumers in the broadband area. In addition to vigorously enforcing the antitrust and consumer protection laws, the FTC will expend considerable efforts on consumer education, industry guidance, and competition advocacy in the area of broadband Internet access.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Earnhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2007/06/27/ftc-says-net-neutraliy-is-not-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>John Earnhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2007/06/27/ftc-says-net-neutraliy-is-not-needed/#comment-3577</guid>
		<description>Thoughts from Jeff Campbell of Cisco on the FTC&#039;s report can be seen here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/2007/06/ftc_gets_it_right_on_net_neutr.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/2007/06/ftc_gets_it_right_on_net_neutr.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
His Net Net on NN: &quot;There is no reason to rush to impose burdensome Net Neutrality regulations in the broadband market. If there is one thing that we have learned from 70+ years of communications regulation, it is that regulation has significant costs and unintended consequences. The FTC clearly recognizes that government should react to actual problems, not hypothetical ones.&quot;
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughts from Jeff Campbell of Cisco on the FTC&#8217;s report can be seen here: <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/2007/06/ftc_gets_it_right_on_net_neutr.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/2007/06/ftc_gets_it_right_on_net_neutr.html</a><br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
His Net Net on NN: &#8220;There is no reason to rush to impose burdensome Net Neutrality regulations in the broadband market. If there is one thing that we have learned from 70+ years of communications regulation, it is that regulation has significant costs and unintended consequences. The FTC clearly recognizes that government should react to actual problems, not hypothetical ones.&#8221;<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

