<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is $29.99 worth to Apple?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical weblog for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a twice weekly tech podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Knights</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3961</link>
		<dc:creator>John Knights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/#comment-3961</guid>
		<description>Huh? I don&#039;t get why anybody would complain about having to pay money for software that somebody has laboured over and gives value for money in some way. Is $30 really so much to ask for something that does quite a lot of useful things?
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
I would agree that paying over and over for newer versions of the same software at full price does indeed stretch the limits of value if that is the case but I cannot see how anybody can complain that QT ought to be ought right free on the basis that they spend a lot of money with Apple.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? I don&#8217;t get why anybody would complain about having to pay money for software that somebody has laboured over and gives value for money in some way. Is $30 really so much to ask for something that does quite a lot of useful things?<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
I would agree that paying over and over for newer versions of the same software at full price does indeed stretch the limits of value if that is the case but I cannot see how anybody can complain that QT ought to be ought right free on the basis that they spend a lot of money with Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susabelle</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3960</link>
		<dc:creator>Susabelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/#comment-3960</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, Nerraux and Mike.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
Yes, Nerraux, I know I could have torrented a QT code if I&#039;d wanted, but of course, we aren&#039;t pirates, right? :)  And if I keep up this video thing with the kids, I may just have to invest in some real video editing software.  The other thing that bugged me that I didn&#039;t mention was that it looks like QTPro is simply an advertisement space, much like iTunes is on its front page.  That really annoys me, too.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
And Mike, I will never take portrait-format video with this camera again.  I&#039;m assuming, maybe wrongly, that a newer model will auto-adjust orientation for me.  It will be something I&#039;ll be looking at before I buy a video camera in the future.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Nerraux and Mike.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
Yes, Nerraux, I know I could have torrented a QT code if I&#8217;d wanted, but of course, we aren&#8217;t pirates, right? <img src='http://www.geeknewscentral.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   And if I keep up this video thing with the kids, I may just have to invest in some real video editing software.  The other thing that bugged me that I didn&#8217;t mention was that it looks like QTPro is simply an advertisement space, much like iTunes is on its front page.  That really annoys me, too.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
And Mike, I will never take portrait-format video with this camera again.  I&#8217;m assuming, maybe wrongly, that a newer model will auto-adjust orientation for me.  It will be something I&#8217;ll be looking at before I buy a video camera in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Staples</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3959</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Staples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/#comment-3959</guid>
		<description>I shot video that way myself, and ran into the same problem. In my case, once I had converted it  to display properly I realized how useless video shot in portrait format really is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shot video that way myself, and ran into the same problem. In my case, once I had converted it  to display properly I realized how useless video shot in portrait format really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nerraux</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3958</link>
		<dc:creator>Nerraux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/04/28/what-is-2999-worth-to-apple/#comment-3958</guid>
		<description>Quicktime player that comes with the machine has always been just a player, just like Windows Media or whatever they&#039;re using now. It sucks, but if you want to do video production of any kind you&#039;re pretty much stuck buying something. That said, I&#039;ve [allegedly] probably borrowed as many QT reg codes as I&#039;ve bought over the years because you shouldn&#039;t have to keep paying for the same software over and over when there&#039;s more robust vid production software out there for the same price.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
I too know what it is to thirst [vaguely relevant White Men Can&#039;t Jump quote].
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quicktime player that comes with the machine has always been just a player, just like Windows Media or whatever they&#8217;re using now. It sucks, but if you want to do video production of any kind you&#8217;re pretty much stuck buying something. That said, I&#8217;ve [allegedly] probably borrowed as many QT reg codes as I&#8217;ve bought over the years because you shouldn&#8217;t have to keep paying for the same software over and over when there&#8217;s more robust vid production software out there for the same price.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
I too know what it is to thirst [vaguely relevant White Men Can't Jump quote].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
