<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reverted Back to Firefox 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/10/24/reverted-back-to-firefox-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/10/24/reverted-back-to-firefox-2/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical site for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a Family of Tech Shows and Content.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/10/24/reverted-back-to-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4255</link>
		<dc:creator>mark schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/10/24/reverted-back-to-firefox-2/#comment-4255</guid>
		<description>I had the same issue&#039;s with FF3 and did the same thing. FF2 might be a ram hog but it&#039;s far more stable. Opera is fast and very stable, IE8 works well also. Chrome is fast but is not really a full featured browser and is based on an older version of Webkit that has security issues.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same issue&#8217;s with FF3 and did the same thing. FF2 might be a ram hog but it&#8217;s far more stable. Opera is fast and very stable, IE8 works well also. Chrome is fast but is not really a full featured browser and is based on an older version of Webkit that has security issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/10/24/reverted-back-to-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4254</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2008/10/24/reverted-back-to-firefox-2/#comment-4254</guid>
		<description>The important thing to remember is that Firefox 2 goes end of life in December.... aka no more updates.
&lt;span class=&quot;mt-export2wp&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
I wouldn&#039;t use a near end of life browser due to the impending doom of no more updates (not good security wise).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important thing to remember is that Firefox 2 goes end of life in December&#8230;. aka no more updates.<br />
<span class="mt-export2wp"></span><br />
I wouldn&#8217;t use a near end of life browser due to the impending doom of no more updates (not good security wise).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

