<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Changing Face of News and Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2010/07/26/the-changing-face-of-news-and-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2010/07/26/the-changing-face-of-news-and-journalism/</link>
	<description>Geek News Central is the technical site for Geeks. We Spin tech for the common man. With a Family of Tech Shows and Content.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomwiles</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2010/07/26/the-changing-face-of-news-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-19594</link>
		<dc:creator>tomwiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/?p=13313#comment-19594</guid>
		<description>Andrew Marr has a good point regarding people buying more e-books on Amazon than real physical books.

Does that not indicate that people are willing to pay for good content?

I contend that it does. E-books worth paying for are concentrated information al a carte. The traditional newspaper is akin to cable channel bundling -- make newspaper buyers pay for a lot of content they have absolutely no interest in the same way cable bundles a bunch of channels together.

In an ever faster-paced world with increasingly redefined and ever more sophisticated choices, the information publishers that get the formula right will reap the benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Marr has a good point regarding people buying more e-books on Amazon than real physical books.</p>
<p>Does that not indicate that people are willing to pay for good content?</p>
<p>I contend that it does. E-books worth paying for are concentrated information al a carte. The traditional newspaper is akin to cable channel bundling &#8212; make newspaper buyers pay for a lot of content they have absolutely no interest in the same way cable bundles a bunch of channels together.</p>
<p>In an ever faster-paced world with increasingly redefined and ever more sophisticated choices, the information publishers that get the formula right will reap the benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNC-2010-07-26 #596 Gamma Ray Findings Not Good - Geek News Central</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2010/07/26/the-changing-face-of-news-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-19439</link>
		<dc:creator>GNC-2010-07-26 #596 Gamma Ray Findings Not Good - Geek News Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/?p=13313#comment-19439</guid>
		<description>[...] to a car near you. More info on Consumer 3d Camera. CTIA goes after Cell Phone Radiation Law. Changing face of Journalism. Do Regular People understand Public Lives were Living? Cloud Perspectives. What Planet is CNN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a car near you. More info on Consumer 3d Camera. CTIA goes after Cell Phone Radiation Law. Changing face of Journalism. Do Regular People understand Public Lives were Living? Cloud Perspectives. What Planet is CNN [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Boyreau</title>
		<link>http://www.geeknewscentral.com/2010/07/26/the-changing-face-of-news-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-19404</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Boyreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeknewscentral.com/?p=13313#comment-19404</guid>
		<description>One point : people NEVER really paid for &quot;news&quot; but for what news were in, that is the paper.

Today people KEEPS on paying for what news is in, that is the computers and the distribution (broadband) fee.

The main problem is that today the container has become a one-shot universal purchase, decoupled from the content.

So the real question is : will people EVER pay for content ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One point : people NEVER really paid for &#8220;news&#8221; but for what news were in, that is the paper.</p>
<p>Today people KEEPS on paying for what news is in, that is the computers and the distribution (broadband) fee.</p>
<p>The main problem is that today the container has become a one-shot universal purchase, decoupled from the content.</p>
<p>So the real question is : will people EVER pay for content ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

